MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE

2020 Regular Session

To: Veterans and Military Affairs; Judiciary, Division A

By: Senator(s) Seymour

Senate Bill 2821

AN ACT TO AMEND SECTIONS 93-21-5, 93-21-7, 93-21-16 AND 93-21-21, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO PROVIDE THAT VENUE FOR ANY ACTION AGAINST A MEMBER OF THE MISSISSIPPI NATIONAL GUARD SHALL BE BROUGHT IN A STATE MILITARY COURT PURSUANT TO LAW; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

     BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:

     SECTION 1.  Section 93-21-5, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

     93-21-5.  (1)  The municipal, justice, county or chancery court, or a state military court as defined in Section 33-13-151 shall have jurisdiction over proceedings under this chapter as provided in this chapter.  The petitioner's right to relief under this chapter shall not be affected by his leaving the residence or household to avoid further abuse.

     (2)  Venue shall be proper in any county or municipality where the respondent resides or in any county or municipality where the alleged abusive act or acts occurred.  Any action alleged against a member of the Mississippi National Guard and brought in a state military court proceeding as defined in Section 33-13-151 shall be the sole province of the Mississippi National Guard, venue shall only be proper before a state military court as defined in Section 33-13-151, and shall be subject to all the applicable laws, procedures, rules and/or regulations as set forth in Title 33.

     (3)  If a petition for an order for protection from domestic abuse is filed in a court lacking proper venue, the court, upon objection of the respondent, shall transfer the action to the appropriate venue pursuant to other applicable law.

     (4)  A record shall be made of any proceeding in justice or municipal court that involves domestic abuse.

     SECTION 2.  Section 93-21-7, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

     93-21-7.  (1)  Any person may seek a domestic abuse protection order for himself by filing a petition alleging abuse by the respondent.  Any parent, adult household member, or next friend of the abused person may seek a domestic abuse protection order on behalf of any minor children or any person alleged to be incompetent by filing a petition with the court alleging abuse by the respondent.  Cases seeking relief under this chapter shall be priority cases on the court's docket and the judge shall be immediately notified when a case is filed in order to provide for expedited proceedings.

     (2)  A petition seeking a domestic abuse protection order may be filed in any of the following courts:  municipal, justice, county or chancery, or a state military court as defined in Section 33-13-151.  A chancery court shall not prohibit the filing of a petition which does not seek emergency relief on the basis that the petitioner did not first seek or obtain temporary relief in another court.  A petition requesting emergency relief pending a hearing shall not be filed in chancery court unless specifically permitted by the chancellor under the circumstances or as a separate pleading in an ongoing chancery action between the parties.  Nothing in this section shall:

          (a)  Be construed to require consideration of emergency relief by a chancery court; or

          (b)  Preclude a chancery court from entering an order of emergency relief.

     (3)  The petitioner in any action brought pursuant to this chapter shall not bear the costs associated with its filing or the costs associated with the issuance or service of any notice of a hearing to the respondent, issuance or service of an order of protection on the respondent, or issuance or service of a warrant or witness subpoena.  If the court finds that the petitioner is entitled to an order protecting the petitioner from abuse, the court shall be authorized to assess all costs including attorney's fees of the proceedings to the respondent.  The court may assess costs including attorney's fees to the petitioner only if the allegations of abuse are determined to be without merit and the court finds that the petitioner is not a victim of abuse as defined by Section 93-21-3.

     SECTION 3.  Section 93-21-16, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

     93-21-16.  (1)  A protective order from another jurisdiction issued to protect the applicant from abuse as defined in Section 93-21-3, or a protection order as defined in Section 93-22-3, issued by a tribunal of another state, or a similar court by a state military court as defined in Section 33-13-151, shall be accorded full faith and credit by the courts of this state and enforced in this state as provided for in the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act.

     (2)  For purposes of enforcement by Mississippi law enforcement officers, a protective order from another jurisdiction, or a protection order as defined in Section 93-22-3 and issued by a tribunal of another state, is presumed to be valid if it meets the requirements of Section 93-22-7.

     (3)  For purposes of judicial enforcement of a protective order issued in another jurisdiction, or a protection order as defined in Section 93-22-3 and issued by a tribunal of another state, an order is presumed valid if it meets the requirements of Section 93-22-5(4).  It is an affirmative defense in any action seeking enforcement of a protective order issued in another jurisdiction, or a protection order as defined in Section 93-22-3 and issued by a tribunal of another state, that any criteria for the validity of the order is absent.

     SECTION 4.  Section 93-21-21, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

     93-21-21.  (1)  Upon a knowing violation of (a) a protection order or court-approved consent agreement issued pursuant to this chapter, (b) a similar order issued by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting a person from domestic abuse, or a similar court by a state military court as defined in Section 33-13-151, or (c) a bond condition imposed pursuant to Section 99-5-37, the person violating the order or condition commits a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months or a fine of not more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00), or both.

     (2)  Alternatively, upon a knowing violation of a protection order or court-approved consent agreement issued pursuant to this chapter or a bond condition issued pursuant to Section 99-5-37, the issuing court may hold the person violating the order or bond condition in contempt, the contempt to be punishable as otherwise provided by applicable law.  A person shall not be both convicted of a misdemeanor and held in contempt for the same violation of an order or bond condition.

     (3)  When investigating allegations of a violation under subsection (1) of this section, law enforcement officers shall utilize the uniform offense report prescribed for this purpose by the Office of the Attorney General in consultation with the sheriff's and police chief's associations.  However, failure of law enforcement to utilize the uniform offense report shall not be a defense to a crime charged under subsection (1) of this section.

     (4)  In any conviction for a violation of a domestic abuse protection order as described in subsection (1) of this section, the court shall enter the disposition of the matter into the corresponding uniform offense report.

     (5)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere with the court's authority, if any, to address bond condition violations in a more restrictive manner.

     SECTION 5.  This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2020.