MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE
2016 Regular Session
To: Corrections
By: Senator(s) Gollott
AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 47-5-35, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO REVISE THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CORRECTIONAL AUDITOR; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:
SECTION 1. Section 47-5-35, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:
47-5-35. (1) The
Joint Legislative Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review
(PEER) shall appoint an auditor to audit the correctional system, and provide
sufficient office facilities in the Jackson office, who shall be a certified
public accountant, a certified fraud examiner, or an experienced
accountant, * * * with experience
appropriate to the responsibilities of the position.
(2) The powers and duties of the auditor shall include:
(a) Conducting audits and reviews of any inmate or financial information of the Department of Corrections and its institutions, or any regional correctional facility, county jail or private prison facility housing inmates committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections, community work center, restitution center, or any community corrections activity or function, as required by the Legislative Budget Office, the Chairs of the House and Senate Corrections Committees, or the PEER Committee Executive Director;
(b) Assisting the PEER Committee staff in carrying out any responsibility it has respecting corrections programs provided for in Section 27-103-159, Mississippi Code of 1972;
(c) Auditing or reviewing purchases, personal services contracts, inventories, staffing, security and any other management or operational practices of the Department of Corrections, its institutions and its community corrections functions as deemed necessary by the Chairs of the House and Senate Corrections Committees individually, the Legislative Budget Office, or the Executive Director of the Legislative PEER Committee and recommending changes in accordance with either Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) standards, industry best practices, any other management or evaluation standards that the auditor or the PEER Executive Director considers appropriate;
(d) To review any activities of the Parole Board as directed by the House and Senate Corrections Chairs, the Executive Director of the Legislative PEER Committee, or the Legislative Budget Office;
(e) Preparing any reports or requests necessary to answer concerns raised by any member of the Legislature regarding the Mississippi Department of Corrections or any inmates under its custody. Such legislative assistance shall be prepared, filed, and distributed in accordance with the rules of the PEER Committee;
(f) To do all things necessary and proper to carry out the activities described in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this subsection.
(3) Such auditor
shall make * * *
a * * * periodic
report to the Legislative Budget Office and the Chairman of the Corrections
Committee of the Senate and the Chairman of the * * * Corrections Committee in
the House of Representatives. Such reports shall contain a summary of all
work conducted respecting paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) in subsection (2) of
this section.
* * *
(4) The Department of Corrections, regional correctional authorities, local jail administrators and sheriffs, and all private prisons holding inmates committed to the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections shall cooperate with the auditor and provide access to any persons, including inmates, records, files, documents, computer drives, or other media containing information related to the operation of such facilities. Further, the Department of Corrections shall provide the auditor with real-time, remote, read-only access to any and all computer databases that the department maintains. Such access shall ensure that the auditor may download data for use in any analysis the auditor deems necessary and useful. It is the policy of the Legislature that all information contained or maintained by such entities shall be subject to review by the auditor at such times, as the auditor deems appropriate. All files of the auditor are subject to the rules of the PEER Committee and may only be used or disclosed in accordance with those rules.
(5) In the event that the representatives of the Department of Corrections or any other officer, employee, or entity set out in subsection (4) of this section fails to provide either access to persons or information as requested, the auditor may seek the assistance of the PEER Committee through the issuance of subpoenas or subpoenas duces tecum for the procurement of testimony or the production of documents. In any instance wherein the representatives of the Department of Corrections or any other officer, employee, or entity set out in subsection (4) of this section fails to comply with a subpoena, the PEER Committee, through a committee resolution, may seek the assistance of the Attorney General in enforcing such subpoenas through the chancery courts of the state. Any public officer or employee, or any employee of a private correctional facility who fails to comply with a subpoena may be brought before the chancery court to show cause why such person should not be found in contempt of the committee. After notice and hearing, the court shall have the power to find a recalcitrant witness to be in contempt of the committee and shall have the power to confine such person to the county jail until such person agrees to comply with the subpoena, thereby purging the contempt.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2016.