House Bill 1143

AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 99-3-47, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO AUTHORIZE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES FOR ANY WARRANT OR DOMESTIC ABUSE PROTECTION ORDERS; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI:

SECTION 1. Section 99-3-47, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

99-3-47. (1) An application for a * * *~~felony~~ warrant or domestic abuse protection order or signature utilized by the judicial branch of state government other than an application for a no-knock warrant shall not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form. An application, signature or record in electronic form shall have the full effect of law.

(2) If a provision of law requires the application for a * * *~~felony~~ warrant or domestic abuse protection order to be in writing, an electronic version of the written record shall satisfy such provision of law.

(3) If a provision of law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies such provision of law.

(4) An application used to attach a digital signature to * * *~~felony~~ warrant * * *or, affidavit or domestic abuse protection order must have security procedures in place that ensure the authenticity of the digital signature. The application must also be able to keep an electronic record of the warrant or affidavit, including the time and date of when the signature was attached. The application must also include encryption measures to ensure secure access of the application.

(5) Unless otherwise agreed to by a sender of a warrant application and the judge, an electronic record is received when:

(a) The record enters an information-processing system that the local court rules have designated and approved for the purpose of receiving electronic applications for warrants and from which the recipient is able to retrieve the electronic record; and

(b) It is in a form capable of being processed by the system, and in a form that satisfies the provisions of the Mississippi Public Records Act of 1983.

(6) In an instance where an affidavit is submitted to a judge electronically, the electronic signature of the affiant shall satisfy the constitutional requirement that the testimony of the affiant be made under oath, provided that such signature is made under penalty of perjury and in compliance with subsection (4) of this section. If the requirements of subsection (4) of this section are met, it shall not be necessary for the oath to be made orally for the affidavit to have legal effect.

(7) An application for a * * *~~felony~~ warrant, domestic abuse protection order or signature made pursuant to this section shall contain a statement that the application is being made for a * * *~~felony~~ criminal investigation.

(8) Before an electronic * * *~~felony~~ warrant or domestic abuse protection order shall be issued pursuant to this section, the applicant shall be required to meet with a judge. The meeting required by this subsection may be through the use of video or teleconference devices.

(9) This section shall not authorize the issuance of no-knock warrants by the use of electronic warrant applications or electronic signatures for the applications.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect and be in force from and after July 1, 2026.